flooded areas
flooded areas
Western highway
(marks at each £ mile between mile 8 to 15)
highway.
-t—h- Western highway
flood flow direction
'channel' routes of deepest water in relation to the
Western highway.
3.2. Metric Camera investigations
Metric Camera imagery of the lower floodplain was
obtained from scene 0901 with a nominal ground resol
ution of about 20m. (Schroeder I985). The stereoscopic
possibilities of this information source were not sui
table for an area of such low relief (Dowman 1985) but
enlargements at 1:250,000 and 1:50,000 scale provided
durable prints despite some degradation of the image.
Distortional effects of the enlargements were present
and the relationship of the image to map scales were
identified as being in the average form:
Map scale = 1.0706 - 7.56 x Image scale
The interest of this imagery is not only to identify
its ability in presenting the features of the flood-
plain but also the extent to which these features may
be presented without the advantage of a flood event
occurring. The Metric Camera imagery was found to give
an accurate identification of vegetation distribution
as an adjunct to LANDSAT data, where the spectral
signatures of different, mixed land cover types may
confuse such identification.
From the observation of Metric Camera imagery at and
around the area miles 9£ 60 12^ on the Western highway
the-locations of relatively high and low land were seen
Differences in vegetation density, the presence of
human activity (consistantly confined to the 'pine
ridge' higher ground in this region), tracks and other
associated features provided indicators. Features less
than 10 metres in width were seen by contrast with their
surroundings.
The disposition of higher features indicated a conce
ntration of floodwater around the Almond Hill and the
Straight lagoon sections of the highway as can be seen
ih figure 5.
3*3. Ground survey investigations
The survey (Richards and Dumbleton 1981) was under
taken to identify the location of most severe flooding
on the Western highway and propose remedial measures.
It provides precise elevations between miles 0 to 15
on the highway but was less concerned with the internal
drainage of the floodplain. The opinion of the report
was that "..this section of the road (miles 9is 60 12^)
is believed to be affected by the backwater from the
Sibun river., and overflow from the Belize river"
(Richards and Dumbleton 1981:84).
The elevations of the flood levels are not strictly
defined by the report and are taken from anecdotal
sources and estimated as being 2metres over this part
of the highway (Richards and Dumbleton 1961:85).
The consideration of channel-full capacities of the
Belize river led the authors of the report to draw the
following conclusions:
1. That overspill from the Belize river around Davis
Bank would be relatively small.
2. Upstream of Davis Bank, the attenuation of the
flood peak by the channel was probably more important
than loss to the floodplain, though overspill was not
ruled out.
3. No correlation could be found between the three
possible sources of floodwater.
4. Flooding appeared to be closely linked to high
levels in the Sibun.
Figure 6 illustrates the survey's levelling of the
flood prone part of the highway and may be used in