Retrodigitalisierung Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Fusion of sensor data, knowledge sources and algorithms for extraction and classification of topographic objects

Access restriction

There is no access restriction for this record.

Copyright

CC BY: Attribution 4.0 International. You can find more information here.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: Fusion of sensor data, knowledge sources and algorithms for extraction and classification of topographic objects

Monograph

Persistent identifier:
856473650
Author:
Baltsavias, Emmanuel P.
Title:
Fusion of sensor data, knowledge sources and algorithms for extraction and classification of topographic objects
Sub title:
Joint ISPRS/EARSeL Workshop ; 3 - 4 June 1999, Valladolid, Spain
Scope:
III, 209 Seiten
Year of publication:
1999
Place of publication:
Coventry
Publisher of the original:
RICS Books
Identifier (digital):
856473650
Illustration:
Illustrationen, Diagramme, Karten
Language:
English
Usage licence:
Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Publisher of the digital copy:
Technische Informationsbibliothek Hannover
Place of publication of the digital copy:
Hannover
Year of publication of the original:
2016
Document type:
Monograph
Collection:
Earth sciences

Chapter

Title:
TECHNICAL SESSION 7 APPLICATIONS IN FORESTRY
Document type:
Monograph
Structure type:
Chapter

Chapter

Title:
A LOCAL CORRELATION APPROACH FOR THE FUSION OF REMOTE SENSING DATA WITH DIFFERENT SPATIAL RESOLUTIONS IN FORESTRY APPLICATIONS. J. Hill, C. Diemer, O. Stöver, Th. Udelhoven
Document type:
Monograph
Structure type:
Chapter

Contents

Table of contents

  • Fusion of sensor data, knowledge sources and algorithms for extraction and classification of topographic objects
  • Cover
  • ColorChart
  • Title page
  • CONTENTS
  • PREFACE
  • TECHNICAL SESSION 1 OVERVIEW OF IMAGE / DATA / INFORMATION FUSION AND INTEGRATION
  • DEFINITIONS AND TERMS OF REFERENCE IN DATA FUSION. L. Wald
  • TOOLS AND METHODS FOR FUSION OF IMAGES OF DIFFERENT SPATIAL RESOLUTION. C. Pohl
  • INTEGRATION OF IMAGE ANALYSIS AND GIS. Emmanuel Baltsavias, Michael Hahn,
  • TECHNICAL SESSION 2 PREREQUISITES FOR FUSION / INTEGRATION: IMAGE TO IMAGE / MAP REGISTRATION
  • GEOCODING AND COREGISTRATION OF MULTISENSOR AND MULTITEMPORAL REMOTE SENSING IMAGES. Hannes Raggam, Mathias Schardt and Heinz Gallaun
  • GEORIS : A TOOL TO OVERLAY PRECISELY DIGITAL IMAGERY. Ph.Garnesson, D.Bruckert
  • AUTOMATED PROCEDURES FOR MULTISENSOR REGISTRATION AND ORTHORECTIFICATION OF SATELLITE IMAGES. Ian Dowman and Paul Dare
  • TECHNICAL SESSION 3 OBJECT AND IMAGE CLASSIFICATION
  • LANDCOVER MAPPING BY INTERRELATED SEGMENTATION AND CLASSIFICATION OF SATELLITE IMAGES. W. Schneider, J. Steinwendner
  • INCLUSION OF MULTISPECTRAL DATA INTO OBJECT RECOGNITION. Bea Csathó , Toni Schenk, Dong-Cheon Lee and Sagi Filin
  • SCALE CHARACTERISTICS OF LOCAL AUTOCOVARIANCES FOR TEXTURE SEGMENTATION. Annett Faber, Wolfgang Förstner
  • BAYESIAN METHODS: APPLICATIONS IN INFORMATION AGGREGATION AND IMAGE DATA MINING. Mihai Datcu and Klaus Seidel
  • TECHNICAL SESSION 4 FUSION OF SENSOR-DERIVED PRODUCTS
  • AUTOMATIC CLASSIFICATION OF URBAN ENVIRONMENTS FOR DATABASE REVISION USING LIDAR AND COLOR AERIAL IMAGERY. N. Haala, V. Walter
  • STRATEGIES AND METHODS FOR THE FUSION OF DIGITAL ELEVATION MODELS FROM OPTICAL AND SAR DATA. M. Honikel
  • INTEGRATION OF DTMS USING WAVELETS. M. Hahn, F. Samadzadegan
  • ANISOTROPY INFORMATION FROM MOMS-02/PRIRODA STEREO DATASETS - AN ADDITIONAL PHYSICAL PARAMETER FOR LAND SURFACE CHARACTERISATION. Th. Schneider, I. Manakos, Peter Reinartz, R. Müller
  • TECHNICAL SESSION 5 FUSION OF VARIABLE SPATIAL / SPECTRAL RESOLUTION IMAGES
  • ADAPTIVE FUSION OF MULTISOURCE RASTER DATA APPLYING FILTER TECHNIQUES. K. Steinnocher
  • FUSION OF 18 m MOMS-2P AND 30 m LANDS AT TM MULTISPECTRAL DATA BY THE GENERALIZED LAPLACIAN PYRAMID. Bruno Aiazzi, Luciano Alparone, Stefano Baronti, Ivan Pippi
  • OPERATIONAL APPLICATIONS OF MULTI-SENSOR IMAGE FUSION. C. Pohl, H. Touron
  • TECHNICAL SESSION 6 INTEGRATION OF IMAGE ANALYSIS AND GIS
  • KNOWLEDGE BASED INTERPRETATION OF MULTISENSOR AND MULTITEMPORAL REMOTE SENSING IMAGES. Stefan Growe
  • AUTOMATIC RECONSTRUCTION OF ROOFS FROM MAPS AND ELEVATION DATA. U. Stilla, K. Jurkiewicz
  • INVESTIGATION OF SYNERGY EFFECTS BETWEEN SATELLITE IMAGERY AND DIGITAL TOPOGRAPHIC DATABASES BY USING INTEGRATED KNOWLEDGE PROCESSING. Dietmar Kunz
  • INTERACTIVE SESSION 1 IMAGE CLASSIFICATION
  • AN AUTOMATED APPROACH FOR TRAINING DATA SELECTION WITHIN AN INTEGRATED GIS AND REMOTE SENSING ENVIRONMENT FOR MONITORING TEMPORAL CHANGES. Ulrich Rhein
  • CLASSIFICATION OF SETTLEMENT STRUCTURES USING MORPHOLOGICAL AND SPECTRAL FEATURES IN FUSED HIGH RESOLUTION SATELLITE IMAGES (IRS-1C). Maik Netzband, Gotthard Meinel, Regin Lippold
  • ASSESSMENT OF NOISE VARIANCE AND INFORMATION CONTENT OF MULTI-/HYPER-SPECTRAL IMAGERY. Bruno Aiazzi, Luciano Alparone, Alessandro Barducci, Stefano Baronti, Ivan Pippi
  • COMBINING SPECTRAL AND TEXTURAL FEATURES FOR MULTISPECTRAL IMAGE CLASSIFICATION WITH ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS. H. He , C. Collet
  • TECHNICAL SESSION 7 APPLICATIONS IN FORESTRY
  • SENSOR FUSED IMAGES FOR VISUAL INTERPRETATION OF FOREST STAND BORDERS. R. Fritz, I. Freeh, B. Koch, Chr. Ueffing
  • A LOCAL CORRELATION APPROACH FOR THE FUSION OF REMOTE SENSING DATA WITH DIFFERENT SPATIAL RESOLUTIONS IN FORESTRY APPLICATIONS. J. Hill, C. Diemer, O. Stöver, Th. Udelhoven
  • OBJECT-BASED CLASSIFICATION AND APPLICATIONS IN THE ALPINE FOREST ENVIRONMENT. R. de Kok, T. Schneider, U. Ammer
  • Author Index
  • Keyword Index
  • Cover

Full text

International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Vol. 32, Part 7-4-3 W6, Valladolid, Spain, 3-4 June, 1999 
achieved at the cost of loosing some original advantages of 
satellite remote sensing. 
1.2. Combined Sensor Resolution and Data Fusion 
The engineer’s answer to the above-described dilemma is a 
compromise. In current and planned systems, lower resolution 
multispectral channels are often complemented by a single 
higher resolution panchromatic band, which provides a 
“representation” of the desired resolution for the multispectral 
channels. With this combined resolution concept, the acquired 
data volume is kept within acceptable bounds, while additional 
spatial details are still made available (Table 1). 
Several sensors with such constellations are already in orbit 
(SPOT, IRS-ID, Landsat 7), while others are planned (e.g. for 
1999 Ikonos-2, Quickbird-1, OrbView-3). Currently, the Indian 
remote sensing satellite IRS-ID offers 5.8m spatial resolution in 
the panchromatic range. The planned new satellite generation 
will provide lm panchromatic and 4m multispectral resolution 
(because of the data quantity problem, this extremely high 
resolution allows only restricted swath widths between 8 and 
22km only). 
Instead of using the panchromatic information separately, there 
is also the option to fuse the high resolution panchromatic band 
with the low resolution multispectral data to improve the spatial 
resolution of the latter (Figure 1). The aim of the fusion 
procedure is to produce high quality data which contains the 
characteristic of both the multispectral information (object 
identification) and the spatial detail (object localisation and 
texture). The “permission” to merge the data is seen in the fact 
that edge localisation (as detail manifestation) is more or less 
identical in different spectral bands and “only” varies in 
strength and polarity (Schowengerdt, 1980; Tom, 1986). 
2. CATEGORIZATION OF DATA FUSION 
TECHNIQUES 
During the last 20 years, many fusion algorithms were 
developed and documented. While the data quantity problem 
and the idea of data fusion stimulated the deployment of 
combined resolution sensors, the increasing availability of 
combined resolution data stimulated the further development of 
fusion algorithms. The intentions of algorithm developers or 
users are quite different. They encompass the desire for simple 
visual enhancements, as well as the demand to reconstruct the 
theoretically “real” high resolution multispectral image (the true 
image) as well as possible. 
Fusion techniques may be categorised into 3 groups, depending 
on how the panchromatic information is used during the fusion 
procedure. 
2.1. Fusion Procedures Using All Panchromatic Band 
Frequencies 
This category includes simple (partially old) band-arithmetic 
techniques, such as addition and multiplication, as well as the 
commonly used and well known component substitution 
techniques such as IHS transformation, principal component 
substitution (PCS) and the more rarely applied regression 
variable substitution (Haydn et al., 1982; Carper et al., 1990; 
Shettigara, 1992; Pellemans et al., 1993). Also the Brovey or 
color normalizing algorithm (Roller and Cox, 1980; Hallada 
and Cox, 1983), which holds an intermediate position between 
band-arithmetic and component substitution techniques, can be 
classified into this group. 
Because all procedures of this category make use of all 
frequencies of the panchromatic channel (which include also 
“spectral” information components related to the lower 
resolution multispectral images), they may produce spectral 
distortions in the result, which depend on the degree of global 
correlation between the panchromatic and the multispectral 
channels to be enhanced. Especially for NIR or SWIR channels, 
this global correlation is usually low, such that fusion 
procedures are bound to fail. Nevertheless, the IHS trans 
formation and the Brovey algorithm are often used to fuse the 
panchromatic band with multispectral channels within the 
visible spectrum (i.e. channels which are highly correlated with 
the panchromatic band). 
2.2. Fusion Procedures Using Selected Panchromatic 
Band Frequencies 
Fusion techniques classified in this group overcome the 
limitation described above, because only the additional high 
resolution spatial information (i.e., the high frequencies) of the 
Î 
multispectral dataset 
(low resolution) 
fusion procedure 
î 
panchromatic band 
(high resolution) 
î 
multispectral dataset 
(high resolution) 
Fig. 1. Concept of data fusion for resolution enhancement (modified after Pradines, 1986).
	        

Cite and reuse

Cite and reuse

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Monograph

METS MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF DFG-Viewer OPAC
TOC

Chapter

PDF RIS

Image

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Monograph

To quote this record the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Chapter

To quote this structural element, the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Image

To quote this image the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

baltsavias, emmanuel p. Fusion of Sensor Data, Knowledge Sources and Algorithms for Extraction and Classification of Topographic Objects. RICS Books, 1999.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

How many grams is a kilogram?:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.